CHAPTER III
Traversing India
THE connection of St. Thomas with King Gundaphor, noted in the
previous chapter, gives us sufficient reason to say that the north
Indian region was one of the fields of the Apostle’s labours. We do
not, however, have today any traces of his apostolate there. This is
not difficult to understand. We know that northwestern India has
always been exposed to foreign invasions down the centuries. It is
not difficult to visualize now the Christian communities might have
been greatly disturbed, dispersed, and finally destroyed. All the
same, it is interesting to note that a certain section of the Sindhis,
and especially the ‘Tata Nagar Fakirs’ seem to venerate the Apostle
under the name ‘Thuma Bhagat’. As the renowned B. Arunananda
wrote: ‘It was at Tatta, on the Indus River in Sindh, where he is still
venerated as “Thuma Bhagat” that, according to tradition, St.
Thomas Apostle worked for some time. These devotees still seem
to practise some Christian rites and possess a book which might
well be the Gospel according to St. Matthew!’
Rev. R. A. Trotter, who had some contact with this community,
wrote about them as follows:
‘To support the contention that the Apostle St. Thomas came
to Sindh, there is a Fakir community living in Tatta, which has
occasionally revealed itself. This Fakir group, to all appearances
Hindu, calls its small community by an Aramaic name, something
like Barthomai, the sons of Thomas, and claims that it is descended
from Christians baptised by St. Thomas himself and that in their
secret society they own books and relics to support their position.
Unfortunately, no outsider, either Indian or European, has had
32
access to the archives of this society, and individual members are
as hard to come by as the Indian lion.’30
Mr. Vincent Smith, the historian, says: ‘Unless Christian
mission connected by tradition with the life of St. Thomas had
visited the Indo-Parthian borderland, it is difficult to imagine how
the obscure name of Gondophares can have come into the story....
if anybody chooses to believe that St. Thomas personally visited the
Indo-Parthian kingdom his belief cannot be considered
unreasonable....’31
In South India
Strong evidence is not wanting to prove that South India, too,
was traversed by St. Thomas in his apostolic journeys. Says the
same Vincent Smith: ‘It must be admitted that a personal visit of the
Appstle to Southern India was easily feasible in the conditions of
the time, and that there is nothing incredible in the traditional belief
that he came by way of Socotra, where an ancient Christians
settlement undoubtedly existed... I am now satisfied that the
Christian Church of Southern India is extremely ancient...’ He
further States: ‘My personal impression formed, after much
examination of the evidence, is that the story of the martyrdom in
Southern India is the better supported of the two versions of the
saint’s death.’32
In the Present-day Kerala...
The Christians of Kerala have always called themselves ‘St.
Thomas’ Christians’. What is known as Kerala today was one of the
three Tamil kingdoms in those days-the Chera Kingdom – and so it
is true to say that the Apostle came to the ancient country of the
Tamils, laboured there most of the time, and laid down his life there
as well. Possibly after some years of apostolate in the North, he
travelled down to the South.
It is known that the Apostles were told by Christ to ‘go rather
to the lost sheep of the House of Israel’ (Matt. 10:6). They were
bidden to announce the ‘good news’ of salvation first to those who
had been called the chosen people of God, but had been, due to
33
their sins and infidelities, twice taken captives: first, by the
Assyrian power in 721 B.C., and next, by the Babylonians in 587
B.C. In the first captivity ten Tribes of Israel were taken captives,
and in the second, the remaining two Tribes. One can easily
understand that in these captives a great many of the ‘House of
Israel’ were certainly ‘lost’. A captivity was no means of prospering
a people!... It is not difficult to see the possibility of some of the
‘lost’ children drifting away from the countries of their captivity to
the neighbouring countries and, at least, for some of them to come
into the present-day India through the north-west. Moreover, it is
known that there were trade routes between India and countries
beyond the north-west such as Persia and other countries (as we
have already shown). It is quite possible, therefore, that colonies of
Israelites or Jews were established especially along the western
coast of India. It is not, then, surprising that the Apostle came
looking for these ‘lost sheep’.
Some traces of such Jewish colonies are not altogether
wanting. In the famous centre of learning, Takshasila, Aramaic
language seems to have become current. In fact an Aramaic
inscription has been found at Takshasila.33 Aramaic was certainly
responsible for the development of a local script – Karoshthi –
which was current during the whole of the first century.
For the same reason as mentioned above, namely, that there
was a Jewish colony in Kerala, St. Thomas may be said to have
come there. It is known in fact that there had been in Cochin a
Jewish colony for many centuries.
Regarding the apostolate of St. Thomas in that part of India
(viz. Kerala) we have a very ancient narrative from a manuscript
preserved by an old family at Palayur. It treats extensively about the
journeys of St. Thomas on the Malabar coast. It is best for the
readers to go through this narrative as a whole to have an idea of
the tradition which is rife in Kerala:
‘I proceed to sing of the manner in which our holy religion
has been introduced into Kerala.
‘The Apostle Thomas landed at Maliankara (i.e. Cranganore)
with Habban the merchant. He (Thomas) worked great miracles and
34
in eight months established in that town, the Church of Jesus
Christ. Then he went to Mailepuram where he preached the Gospel
of the Lord for four months and a half and embarked for China. He
remained in China for four and a half months and returned to
Mailepuram. After he had been there for a month or so, the son-inlaw
of the Rajah of Tiruvanchikulum came to him and besought
him to return to Malabar. They embarked on a ship and came to
Maliankara (Cranganore), where, in less than six months, the
Apostle converted the Rajah and his family, 40 Jews and 400
heathens.
‘He was preaching to the people and built a church
surmounted by a cross and ordained priests. One of the first that he
ordained was the son-in-law of the Rajah. He was named Andrew
and his son-in-law, Peter. Accompanied by Peter, the Apostle went
to Quilon, where he planted a cross and baptised 2,400 heathens.
From Quilon he went to Chayal in the mountains, remained there
a whole year as he had done at Quilon, and baptised 2,800 heathens
and planted a cross. At the request of the two chiefs of
Triepalesuaram he returned to that village. But seeing that the
people had desecrated the cross he had erected there, he cursed the
village (which at the present-day is a heap of ruins). Nevertheless,
he remained there for two months. He again erected the cross and
instructed the people so that they might not return to heathenism
and ordained priest Thomas, one of the chiefs who had always
remained strong in his faith. During these two months that he
remained at Triepalesuaram, he confirmed in their faith all the
Christians and converted 200 pagans. Not far from there, to the
South, he built the church of Niranam and ordained priest, his first
disciple Thomas Maliyakal, who was a native of the place. He then
repaired to Kokkamangalam, where he dwelt one year and
converted 1,500 heathens, erected a cross and taught the people
how to honour God. He visited again Kottakavu-Parur, remaining
there nearly a year and converted 2,200.
‘Thence he went by the southern road to Maliankara and was
pleased to see the flourishing state of that Christian community. He
stayed there only two weeks and started for the north, proceeding
to Palayur, where in one month he baptised 1,280 pagans, and
35
according to his habit, erected a great cross. Towards the end of the
year 59 he returned to Mailapuram (Mylapore). He came back to
Malabar and the angels protected him during the journey. He
remained two months at Maleattur and converted 220 pagans. He
stayed a whole year at Niranam and was satisfied with the faith of
the people there and with the exemplary life they led, and gave
Confirmation to all those that had not yet received the sacrament.
He proceeded to Chayal, taking with him his disciple, Thomas
Rabban Maliyakal. During the year he stayed there, he built a
church and ordained priests and conferred the holy sacrament of
Confirmation on all who bad not yet received it. After that he took
leave of the Christians and told them that they would never see him
again.
And he started for the country of the Tamils. Thomas Rabban
and Peter, the son-in-law of the Rajah, accompanied him for seven
miles and a half and took leave of him. It would be impossible to
relate all the miracles worked by our patron St. Thomas by making
the sign of the cross with his hand that had touched the wounds of
the Lord. Thomas raised to life 29 dead; liberated from the demon
250 possessed; cured 330 lepers; gave sight to 250 blind persons,
the use of their limbs to 120 paralytics and speech to 20 dumb. He
restored to health 280 sick people whom the physicians had
abandoned. He converted to the faith of Christ 17,490 Brahmins,
350 Vaisyas (traders and agriculturists) and 4,280 Sudras
(Untouchables). He consecrated two bishops, ordained seven
priests, four of whom were called Rabban,.and made 21 deacons.
‘This song is an abridged version of the detailed history
written by Thomas Rabban, the second of the family of Maliyakal,
and composed for the use of the people, by the humble priest
Thomas, the forty-eight of the same family, who deposes it begging
his blessing at the feet of the Holy Apostle St. Thomas, on the 2nd
of July 1061.’34
Whatever the merits or demerits of this song, that was
formerly sung in many of the churches in Malabar, there is some
basis for this account of Maliyakal. It is interesting to note that
Maliyakal speaks of St. Thomas’s arrival by sea. The commercial
36
history of the times, lends support to this assumption. He must have
either sailed from Kalyan in North India or from the island of
Socotra. St. Francis Xavier, who landed at Socotra on his way to
India about A.D. 1545, declared that the natives of this island
‘render special honours to the Apostle Thomas, claiming
themselves to be the descendants of Christians begotten to Jesus
Christ by that Apostle in these countries’.35
It is the hoary and unquestioned tradition in Malabar, which
is corroborated by the customs of the place and by ethnological
research, that the Apostle was signally successful in the conversion
of the high caste Nambhudiri Brahmins. Four of the leading
Brahmin families are believed to have been raised to the privilege
of the priesthood. They were:– Palamattam, Sankarapuri, Kalli and
Kallian Kavu. Some of them still exist in Koravalangad. The head
of the Malabar Church – the Archdeacon – had to be selected from
Palamattam. This practice was continued among the Jacobite
seceders, till a hundred years ago.
There is a strong belief throughout Malabar that St. Thomas
founded seven churches or groups of Christians, in the following
places:
1. Cranganore or Maliankara
2. Palur or Palayur
3. Parur or Kottakavu
4. Kokkamangalam
5. Niranam
6. Chayal or Nilakal
7. Quilon or Kollam
All the churches, save the one at Chayal, are on the coast or
very near it. A glance at the map facing page 39 will show that
Palur is the northernmost church while Quilon is the southernmost,
the distance between them being about 230 miles. Chayal is
situated very much in the interior on the Sabarimala Hills. The old
church is now in a dilapidated state amidst jungles.
Kokkamangalam is about 20 miles south of Parur.
Niranam, almost midway between Quilon and
Kokkamangalam is now in the hands of Jacobites, who seceded
37
St. Thomas, as he is represented in Malabar.
He was martyred on St. Thomas Mount about 20 years
after he landed in Malabar.
38
The Land of Malabar on the South-western coast of India.
Seven Churches traditionally established by St. Thomas are
marked by Crosses.
39
from the One, True, Catholic and Apostolic Church in the
seventeenth century, owing to some differences with the Portguese
missionaries. Notice that one of the Jacobite prelates, Mar Severios,
Metropolitan of the Jacobite See of Niranam, made his submission
to the Holy See at Rome, in the year 1937, and was the
Administrator of the Catholic Diocese of Tiruvella, which serves
the needs of the reunited clergy and laity.
Two other Jacobite prelates who came over to the Catholic
fold are Mar Ivanios, known as the ‘Newman of India’, the
Archbishop of Trivandrum and Mar Theophilos, the ex-Bishop of
Tiruvella. There are now three ecclesiastical units, viz. i.e., the
Archdiocese of Trivandrum, the Diocese of Tiruvella and the
Diocese of Bathery and have now over 2,00,000 laity and clergy
who have joined the Catholic fold. They follow the Syro-Malankara
rite.
Palur or Palayur was the stronghold of the Nambhudiri
Brahmins (Highest priestly class of the Hindus) when St. Thomas
arrived there from Cranganore. Israelites had a settlement at
Palayur two thousand years ago. Ruins of an ancient Jewish
Synagogue are still seen outside a Brahmin temple about a furlong
away from the present church. It is a tradition that St. Thomas was
able to convert the greater part of the village after a successful
challenge with the Brahmins.36 The local temple deserted by the
Brahmins as a result of St. Thomas’s efforts, was turned into a
church. Pieces of broken idols and remnants of the old temple were
lying around the church till a short time ago. Two large tanks, one
on the eastern side of the church and the other near the western
gate, are tell-tale relics of the ancient glory of the Hindu temple.
When the Portuguese arrived on the scene, an attempt to
dismantle the old church in view of a new one, was given up owing
to the sentimental objection of the people. Later on, however, a new
church was built carefully so as to enclose the old one which had
wooden walls.37 The inner church was gradually dismantled in
course of time.
Palayur was once the seat of a Bishop. This is evident from
the Bull of Pope Gregory XII, dated 15th March 1580. It
40
admonishes and directs the faithful to ‘be obedient to their prelate
Mar Abraham and George of Christ, the Bishop of Palayur'.
'Obedite vero in Domino Abrhamo Archiepis-copo, vestro Georgio
item Episcopo Palurensi’.38 Incursions and persecutions by Hyder
Ali and Tippu Sultan, the tyrants of Mysore, in the seventeenth
century, reduced this flourishing Catholic centre to the state of
decadence. The beginning of British rule in India (1797-93) saw the
slow and steady rise of the present church. Strangely enough, there
is not a single Brahmin house, at present, in the Palayur village.
Quilon, still a big town, almost the second capital of the
Travancore state, is one of the most ancient Episcopal Sees in India.
It was erected by Pope John XXII in 1330. The church built by St.
Thomas in Quilon, one of the great Catholic centres of India, is
believed to have existed for upwards of a thousand years, when it
was swept away by the sea. Kodangalur or Cranganore became the
centre of Christianity, the Mother Church of Malabar; it was there
that the Apostle established the first bishopric with Xanthipus as
Bishop. In remembrance of the ancient tradition of Cranganore, His
Holiness Leo XIII allowed in 1886, the Bishop of Damao (the now
extinct diocese in the Bombay Presidency) the use of the title
‘Archbishop of Cranganore’.
Maleattur is a famous place of pilgrimage in Malabar. The
tradition is that the Blessed Virgin Mary appeared to St. Thomas on
the summit of the Maleattur mountain.A sanctuary now stands on
the spot. Pilgrims flock to it, especially on the first Sunday after
Easter. It is a custom among the newly-weds of Malabar to make
a pilgrimage to Maleattur on the first Sunday after Easter that
follows their marriage. The foundation stone of the church, which
now caps the mountain at Maleattur, was blessed by Bishop
Medlycott, the first Vicar Apostolic of Trichur. Interestingly enough
pilgrims climbing up and down the slopes, invoke aloud St.
Thomas, calling him, according to their customs ‘Muthappan’ i.e.
grandfather.
Taking into account traditional evidence available in India and
abroad, it may be said that the Apostle was approximately 17 years
in India, viz.: about 4 years in sindh, 6 years at most in Malabar,
41
and 7 years at Mailepuram or Mylapore. Crosses carved on stone,
some of which are attributed to St. Thomas by unbroken tradition,
have not been lost to posterity. The following are the most ancient
crosses so far discovered in Malabar:
1. The cross on the left-side altar in the Valliapalli Church,
Kottayam.
2. The cross on the right-side altar of the same Church.
3. The cross at the Jacobite Church, Kadamattam.
The first two crosses bear the Sassanian-Pahlvi inscription,
which is almost identical with the inscription that is round the cross
on St. Thomas’s Mount. All the three crosses mentioned above are
in Jacobite hands. The most beautiful of the crosses in Malabar,
though not the most ancient, is the one at Pallur.
The date A.D. 52 is now accepted by most scholars as the one
that marks the arrival of St. Thomas at the then well known port of
Cranganore, in Malabar. Colonel Yule, a scholar in this regard and
a strong supporter of the Malabar tradition, is among those that
holds this view.39 It carries conviction, especially, since it is known
that the inhabitants of the island of Socotra, told St. Francis Xavier
of St. Thomas’s landing on the Malabar coast.40
42